INTRODUCTION
We have completed our survey in the pre-decided
three cities. In conducting this survey we have chosen participants randomly
from various sections of the society. On the one hand we have taken lawyers,
doctors, police personals and politicians and on the other hand we have taken
students of colleges (specially graduation level), housewives, unemployed and
illiterate persons. Peoples were belonging to rich families as well as poor
families. We have avoided conducting the survey in particular locality and section
and has done this work by choosing some members from different places randomly.
As we thought to do this job with more extensively
and more scientifically but due to shortage of time we are unable to present a
huge number of participants. One problem is there is also, that we had decided
to take help of judges in this also but they had no much time to cooperate with
us because there busy schedule and Dushehra event . But we are thankful towards
them as they talk to us for few minutes and had given their valuable
instructions and suggestions on crime control which has helped us a great
extent. Due to a low number of
participants it will not be appropriate a chart or give a scientific mask to
this project. We have taken recourse of the general inference which have
fabricated in our mind.
We faced some time limitation in our work, some time
members were not ready to give time some time it was hard to make them
understand the question and situations. During the questions they asked various
hard questions related to crimes and that shows their curiosity in controlling
the crime. Those questions were such that they feel frustrated by present
system of governance. They were denying that government can do anything to
control the crime. Sometimes we feel that they want overall change in system.
If we try to place the situation in defined theories
then we get that state is in state of confusion and anomy. They are unable to
understand what have to do now? Why system is not working properly? They want
to eliminate the crime but who will help them? And this situation itself now
creates a crimino-genic situation which is helpful in increasing crime.
And in last we want say that in this work we will
took about every aspect of crime and analyze the present law on that, reason of
that crime and requirement of present society.
We will try to suggest a better way to save our society and will try to
give an insight about crime.
“ANALISIS
OF THE CRIME, REASON, AND LAWS ON THAT”
Crime in the society means every work which is
against the norms of the society and is condemnable and punishable by law
(State, Sovereign). When it was asked to the peoples that what type of crime is
increasing in the society drastically then answer of the general were divided
as to their social status. Middle class expressly and strongly argued in the
favor of political and crime against property which directly have relation to
the corruption, much debated topic today. But poor people responded in favor of
crime against body and crimes under I.P.C. 1860. Lawyers of the view that crime
is increasing in all aspects but in rural areas there is a vast increase in
crime against poor sections. Those sections do not have any relation over
corruption but it is very hard to live peacefully in even their houses because
strong people don’t want so….
Now we consider
women. According
to the general peoples crime against women is increasing in all aspects either
it is domestic violence or rape or disrespect in society. Maximum men has
accepted that rape is not for pleasure, in general it is the outcome of ego and
accused most probably want to teach/give a lesson to that women or family of
her. IT is only polluted male domination
which results in this way. Some contradicted this saying why a lady unknown
to the accused is raped by them …. Reason behind this is simple POLUTED MALE
DOMINATION &LOW MORAL STANTARD. People have readily discarded women’s
modernization in this regard.
Talking about domestic violence it came to concussion that much
situation plays behind this. Dowry and male domination play a little role in
this field now. Main reasons at present
are Laws for them and conflict even on general issues over in family. Present
laws are providing them recourse of litigation and even a conflict out of home,
and this is finally creating such a situation that help in increasing crime
against them. According to the common sentiments let them do not litigate over
family issues and try to strike a balance between them. But I personally do not
accept this view. There should be laws which can help them more effectively.
Now comes towards children. What people think about
crime against children (especially sexual abuse) and crime committed by the
children? We come to the conclusion as per our data and observation that sexual
abuse of children is increasing and it doesn’t matter that of what gender the
child is... consensus shows that there are only cases on fingers in which
accused are unknown to that children. Always their relatives or their next
doors are offenders in such activity. People were not ready to include family
members in this but they were also not clear that their own brothers/sisters
have an eye on them, especially cousins. It is ALLARMING situation for Indian
civilization. It seems abnormal but who can deny after cases, as they are
coming in picture through the media. It is that there are laws for protection
but who will complain?? It is a big question in bag. People suggest that law
has no role here and it cannot do better job. But it doesn’t mean that there
should be no law on the point. There should be, but it will be for more benefit
that they and citizens get a good moral education and they remain a master of
good character. This is the only way.
When we observe crime by the children, we get that
children are more delinquent and criminal as in comparison with the past. They
are committing heinous crimes as well as pity crimes. Children are committing
some crimes for their own need but they commit crime largely for the others and
under the instructions of the trend criminals. Others are using their innocence
in committing crimes. On the point of law, approach is towards sufficiency of
law. Only very few are recommending for strict laws and strict punishment.
Approach shows that they should not be treated as criminals and let them grow
in healthy environment. There are one other aspects of crime in relation to the
children. That is child labor. According to results child labor is rapidly
increasing in rural as well as in urban areas. And the inflation is playing a
great role in this field. Contractors, restaurants, tea stall, bricks fields,
and construction spots are the major parts where they are being employed either
with their consent or against their consent at very low payments. Laws are sufficient
enough to curb this but that laws have been blended by the loose
administration. People think that, enforceability of those laws should be
insured and citizens also take cognigence of it and do not hire children. And
if they are demanding for work for urgent need, give them work which do not
harm their life and pay properly and also insure their education.
Now we switch over a very sensitive issue which is
related to women and men both. People reported very different view against our own
personal thinking. Some of them asking question about male prostitution now
trending over cities.
When it was asked that is it crime or trade (though
it is crime in India), people were equally claiming for both. Numbers are about
to same. But with one addition, that is if it is organized. And one thing is
more interesting who care ready to accept it as a trade they also want to
control and curb it and also call that it is morally wrong. 0 out of 10 rural
female participants considers it is crime and should be controlled strictly
with strict laws and punishment to both men as well women. But result of 5
urban females was something different. 2 of 5 were in favor of prostitution if
organized and controlled. They do not felt anything wrong in it if both genders
are of same mind. But our study was towards prostitution as crime and peoples
consider it as crime. They also suggest that both are wrong in this act. Both
should be punished. They also accept forced prostitution and suggested very
strong law against those criminals. Facts about their background are showing
that they primarily belongs to poor families and brought in this crime and
later on they and their next coming generation are compelled to remain in this
practice as a reason of un-acceptance of the society to take them back in
mainstream. Thus according to us the Hippocrates (people) who are saying like
this they are not going to accept them back in mainstream. They are saying that
education, rehabilitation, means of a secure and good life should be provided
to them but they are not ready to accept them!!!!! I have a great idea to bring it to an end.
This is
Trace
the places of this practice. Catch the customers. And don’t send them to
prison. In spite of prison expose them to a heavy penalty for their work as they
are hampering the sentiments and reputation of the STATE. And that money should
be managed by a machinery who rehabilitate the prostitutes, provide schools for
healthy education to them, better facilities and employment in healthy
environment so that they can make
themselves to come back in mainstream society. This will really help because
today people don’t get threat by prison because they know they will get bail
without going to prison and later on he will on conviction will pay penalties
which is very low and also will pay money in against of going to prison. And if
there will be a heavy penalty on the spot, it will certainly prevent them to do
such activity. Same process should be adopted in case of rape also along with
imprisonment. (Sanjay
Singh)
Now we move towards criminalization of politics and
white color crimes. As we are speaking through the data we have, and the
inference which we have get by meeting and talking to the people, we are trying
our best to not to mix our presumptions over these issues. But where we have
breached this norm we have clearly acknowledged that thing right then and
there. People are of the view that politics has been criminalized totally and
this is not matter of a question. Every illiterate and literate knows clearly
that crime and politics has been the opposite sides of the same coin. Reason
behind this is hunger of the power. And there is no other reason to justify
this. Not only politics has been criminalized but about maximum if not all
crimes is being committed under protection of politicians and politics.
Communal riots, social divisions, etc. serious crimes are being committed by
national as well as local parties. There is one important component remaining
also, now that is corruption. In the
race of power there is constant need of huge money which leads and catalyzes
the corruption. Now at this level the lobby of politicians, bureaucrats, businessmen
and everyone who can participate, participate in corruption. And this also
increases the data of white color criminals. According to the people there
should be strict laws and enhanced punishment for the politicians and bureaucrats
for the same crimes as against the common man. Data shows that white color
criminals largely belong to bureaucrats and politicians. Only need and want is
the main factor in the case of politicians, pressure from the politicians on
bureaucrats and businessmen along with the their personnel need and want are the factors behind the white
color crime and corruption by later two. Law of our country are not in tune
with the demand and need of the society in this post modern era, as there are new horizons of crimes created by these so called
politicians and bureaucrats and business-houses. In fighting with this, people
regularly suggest that, standard moral education and ethics along with good
laws with effective and transparent enforceability will be an effective and
final armor.
Cyber crime is important field now for the study.
Peoples of our country are not aware of, about cyber space and information
technologies adequately. They constantly expose themselves before cyber
criminals. They do not even know what they are going to do or who is going to
cheat them and harm them. When peoples asked about it they responded that this
crime is increasing. They were asking that there should be strict laws and
strict punishment and at present there is lack of effective law on point.
Punishment is also not satisfactory. People want to know that if an MMS of a
lady is created and posted publically over internet. Consequently that lady
commits suicide. What punishment will be given to that culprit???? Because
suicide itself is a crime and if she survives she may be prosecuted and will be
awarded more punishment than the person who has committed the crime. Therefore
law should be molded as such it can march with the technology. People also feel
that this present police system cannot do better job in this field and there
should be separate cyber police station in the reach of the every common man
who is using instruments of information technology. Here I also want to suggest
way in controlling this crime.
I
think that today it is very easy to get a Sim card, which connects us to
internet as well as mobile phones. Anyone can create e-mail account in any name
without any verification of his identity. Why companies and states are so kind
in guaranteeing such freedom especially in case of e-mail I’d. There are about
no restriction over this issue. And these both issues play a key role in
maximum cyber crimes. My suggestion is that immediately start verification of
mobile connections, internet connections, and all other means which are
providing interconnection facilities. Impose a strict policy over creating
profiles and mail account and insure that any account could not be created
without personal and residential identification along with status record such
as criminal record , social status etc. I am, personally sure that after these
steps cyber crime data will be sunk down rapidly.
Vivek
k. Shukla
It is also necessary that people should be made
aware of this crime and taught them that they immediately report authorities of
the crime.
These are some important crimes which have been
studied. There are several other types of crimes which have not been taken
here. But crimes are crimes and those crimes can be understood on the same
line. We have till now talking about crimes. Now we will take the issues of
police, procedural laws and judiciary. Peoples when asked that police is strong
enough or not then they with maximum number reported that police is much strong
with it present tools. Problem is with their working style not with their power
attached to them by the statutes. They work under the influence of political
leaders and powerful and wealthy people. They work for bribe, money, and their
personal benefits. If they perform their duties honestly then there are no
powerful than a police person today.
Here one thing is also true that there is no
requirement of enhancement of powers of police but this system is facing an
urgent need of reconstitution in the wake of modern development to pace with
the new development in crimes and its horizons.
Above observations were about police and when they
were knocked about procedural laws in which ambit police and judiciary
functions they seems to be very frank in saying that our procedural laws are
out of date and those should be immediately replaced with effective one. Advocate Sri A.K.Singh told that once
(the great name in Indian BAR Sri RAM JETH MALANI when he was law minister)
said that “our procedural laws are tools of income for lawyers”.
According to consensus procedural laws should be easy and user friendly. It
will be then when police and criminal justice system might be functioning
efficiently. Without reconstruction of procedural laws, all laws for better
government of crime and society will be only show peace. So according to common
man our procedural laws immediately should be reframed.
There were two question asking that whether laws for
protection of women and for SC/ST are causing problem in there development and
protection. On these questions people were divided, and some of them are
strongly arguing that laws for their protection but actually they are causing
problem to themselves. According to them laws for women somewhere
discriminating the norms established by our cultural development, and this
discrimination is justified on the ground of reasonable classification, thus
these laws subsists. For example women, now have a right in property. And by
these rights of females, males are feeling insecure about their properties and
this state of mind is compelling to them to behave in some suspicious manner.
This finally causing dispute in family and sometime a situation comes when a
family leads towards litigation and relations comes to an end. Same situation
is with laws for SC/ST. being
discriminatory, these laws provoking forwards which results in hatred for the
reserved, and ultimately crime against them. Here one important suggestion is suggested by
them. That is- don’t make laws which are based on discrimination (reasonable
classification) but try to make laws which provide them good facilities for
their upliftment. And in relation with crime, there is no requirement of
special laws for special class. Because crime is crime whether it is against
women or men, against Hindu or Muslim, against Brahmin, Kshatriya or SC/ST.
Now we will shift our analysis towards judiciary.
Judiciary is strong or not? Judiciary should have executive power especially in
relation with their judgment or not? On the first question people speak in
favor of enhancement of power of judiciary but it also should be
insured that there will be no corruption in judiciary and all the judges will
be of highest moral and educated status, and also they will be highly self
regulated. Because at present they have enough powers but as crime and
corruption is increasing by the conjunction of politicians, bureaucrats, and
business-houses, they need more power. And on the second question people goes
against the constitutionally established principle of distribution of powers.
They advocated that executive power should be given to judiciary.
They reasoned for this, that judiciary
is only delivering judgments and when they will have executive power in
relation with their judgment then justice will be done.
Here, with this question our survey comes to an
end. There are various other issues
which need consideration. Because we have get about totally against opinion on
which laws are being made. It is also true that people have given answers
emotionally but it is also true equally that if emotions and sentiments of
common man are demanding for a change then policy makers should understand
these things and act accordingly. This was about our analysis of the
observations made by people and data we have got. Now in the following some
pages we will put down our observation about crime as a whole, reason, laws and
suggestion for effective tool to eliminate the crime separately.
CRIME: REASON, LAWS AND SUGGETIONS
--------- VIVEK K. SHUKLA
Crime as has been defined by various authorities is
the acts against the norms of the society and for which sanction has been subscribe.
But why anyone does such act is matter of research. From long time many jurist
has done good job upon this field. They have subscribed various theories of
crime. Some has suggested anthropological theories which are responsible for
anyone to be a criminal, some has suggested sociological theories. Various has
been suggested that various situation are reason of crime. Today without any
question sociological concept and various situations for crime can be accepted
as a reasoning of the crime. We have conducted survey in this regard. And get
that apart from these there are some other reasons also contributing in increasement
of crime. At present incompliance of law is the major challenge. There is question mark on the proper laws to
govern the country. And this is playing major role in enhancing a crime. But if
we try to count the reasons which are contributing in enhancement of crime then
those are
·
Need and want of more money and power
·
Discriminatory laws(even within the
constitutional framework in the name of reasonable classification, which is
provoking discriminated section of society)
·
Unrestricted Development
·
Substandard education system. In the
name of convent education capitalists are destroying morality. Today you cannot
find any convent school going child who pray in their parent feet in morning.
He cannot give due respect to unknown senior persons. Even he says only good
morning rash fully with the color of capitalism and corporate professional
culture.
·
Authorities are not listening common
men.
These are some of the reasons which are increasing
crime. One may ask that there are numerous laws and systems (authorities,
judiciary) then why it cannot be controlled and why it is increasing. Then
matter lies in the insufficiency and inefficiency of laws and authorities.
Actually our laws are sufficient and efficient enough to control the crime but
their enforcement is in question. Hardly there is any law which is being
enforcing transparently, honestly and with dedication to curb the crime. Not
only laws there are great problem with authorities working for this purpose.
Police system has been instrumentality of a handful powerful politician and
criminals. They are not working properly. They are strong enough to control
even a larger body but due to their miss-requirement and enthusiasm for bulk
money they are not performing their duties. Reason for this subsists in
education system. They are not properly educated and they have no enthusiasm to
respect of constitution of country and laws. This is great reason in a constant
increase in crime. It is also equally true that with the development, new horizon
of crime has been emerged and our system is unable to take appropriate measures
to enhance its capacity accordingly by the reason of no confidence and
dedication of our legislature.
Suggestions:
With the above discussion we want to suggest some
important ways by which crime can be controlled. Those are:-
Proper
education-
There should be proper arrangement of education.
Here proper word is of much importance. Here proper doesn’t mean that higher
education with global facilities, with parallel technologies of the rest of the
developed countries High professional studies. But here proper means education
with high standard of thought, with morality, love, fraternity, respect of laws
and of living creature, patriotism etc.
A child, men, taught with these will ultimately come out to the
mainstream as a force, which will destroy all evils of the society. Crime is
only one part of that evil.
Laws
should be revised:
We have many laws. But with development of society
and technologies there is need to revise our laws. Our procedural laws should
be very easy and user friendly so that disposal of the cases should be insured.
Authorities
should be provided a tool to terminate the corrupt bureaucrats, and
legislators:
Role of
democracy should be revitalized and because our democracy is mature enough, and
people should have right to terminate an officer and legislator if he is not
properly governing them. This will create fear in these powerful men to behave
in appropriate manner and to thi9nk about law, nation and people. Today they
are sovereign. Their sovereignty should be abolished and reaffirm that country
with its citizens is sovereign.
Judiciary
should be strengthened with some executive powers:
Our judiciary is only
delivering judgments. There is separate executive system to execute those
judgments. It leads corruption and injustice which results in another crime. If
it has executive powers them complete justice should be insured. And faith in laws and justice will be
reestablished.
Try
to end pendency in courts:
Today pendency in courts is major challenge. Every
one is suggesting that e-courts and help of information technology will help in
this regard. But I am speaking against
it. There is no requirement on e-court, no requirement of information tech. in
fight with pendency. Please give more time to judges. They are today engaged in
the works which should be done by clerks. They are hearing leave petitions.
This work if done by the clerks and a judge deal with the cases only I am sure
every judge will get about double time to hear the cares. And if they will have
twofold time it sure the number of pendency will come down to half.
This was my some observation about the crime and
important suggestions which may be helpful in curbing the crime. Some of them
are against the established norms but I am sure that these are very helpful in
present scenario. Anything which was against the norms one time of point became
the norm and trend at one point of time. With this I conclude my point.
CRIME: REASON, LAWS AND SUGGETIONS
------------- SANJAY SINGH
I am happy that we have jointly conducted this
project in want of some new thing in the sphere of crime. In previous pages we
have discussed upon the results arrived at by the survey. And in last 3 pages
Mr. VIVEK K SHUKLA has presented their observation and suggestion about the
concerned topic. Now I also want to through some light on the topic and present
my thought over control of crime.
Crime
as has been defined, acts which are against the norms of society and sanctioned
for the punishment by the state, is incomplete and ironic at present.
I will discuss this under a different head. First I want to point out the
reasons of the crime, present laws and my suggestions.
There were traditional crimes and so were the
reasons of the crime. But the crime has multidimensional face so is the
reasons. Primarily, need and want of
the peoples are the main reason of crime. Rest reasons are only outcome
of these important reasons. My friend Vivek k. Shukla has enumerated the
substandard education as one important reason of the crime. But I think need
and want play an important role in this issue also. Because people who are responsible
for education are acting according to their own need and want. And this is
resulting in substandard education. So for controlling the crime state must act
in the manner by which need of common people can be fulfilled. State should
take measures to establish standard of education which can help in producing
good citizens to protect the society.
This only will not suffice the purpose. In this
tremendous job law and law enforcement mechanism also have to play an important
role. Today there are heavy numbers of enacted laws, strong mechanism to control
the crime. But after the survey I am of the view that these laws themselves are
increasing crime. According to me
laws and mechanism itself is a great reason behind the crime. I don’t
mean that these laws and system is bad. Today common people are thinking that
laws are sufficient and system is strong enough to save the society but any of
them are not working properly. Authorities are misusing the laws for their own
purpose. There are laws but there
enforcement is in question. For better check on crime this question should be
solved immediately. I am also of the same view that of the observations
that everything is sufficient. Only need of the society is that these should
act honestly and transparently. Our procedural laws are main hurdle in our
judicial system. These laws urgently should be replaced by new procedural laws
which suits today’s fast moving civilization. It should be prepared in the way
that they remain user friendly. I
also think that there is requirement to develop our laws and jurisprudence now
in the wake of modern technological era. This step will help us more.
My friend has discussed about pendency. It is true that today India is facing
pendency of the cases. He has stated that there is no requirement of
modernization of the system but there is need to provide better environment to proceed
with their duties. This suggestion will be welcomed by the society. Because
today judges need more work hours, they don’t need computers and e-courts but
they need not to hear leave applications, follow futile proceedings etc. involvement
of technology should be in conducting an investigation, placing cases before a
judge for hearing. This will surly reduce their work to listen the cases and
decide them quickly.
Now I want to attract the attention on the political
nexus with the crime. If you see the crime record graph prepared by the NCRB,
then you will get that IPC crimes get a hike after 2003. Graph shows that
between 2003 and 2011 there is constant high increase in crime. Graph line gets
about 45 degree angle path in increasement in crime. It means when UPA hold the power of consensus crime starts with a
new energy. People should understand this and demand for RIGHT TO CALL
BACK their representatives from Parliament. And choose a relatively good
government. In short my suggestion is that people DO POLITICS to save their
society.
These were my observations and suggestions about the
crime. In following pages I want to discuss the CRIME definition. And some new
aspects which are important to know in contemporary world. I will try to make
understood the crime as it is today and solutions.
CRIME AS IT IS TODAY
Crime
has been defined by various authorities. But I arrived at a different
conclusion after study. I want to show the crime from a different angle.
Actually CRIME IS NOTHING BUT AN OUTCOME OF SOCIEAL CONSTRUCTION.
I am saying so because if we compare the civilization and society with and
construction site or with any engineering construction then we will get some
common features in both. When a rode, building or anything is constructed it is
obvious that there will be some garbage, useless materials etc. and no one can
deny of them. Only better management solves the purpose. After better
management also, there will garbage and useless raw materials. And this can be
overcome by recycling. It means there is no possibility of development without
deconstruction, garbage and useless materials etc. Same is with civilization,
culture and society. These are not static concepts. These are dynamic. They get
new meanings, new aspects and horizons. And when these changes took place it is
obvious that something will remain as garbage and dust… means there could not
be any change or development without this shortcoming. This garbage is the outcome from mass with the culture, civilization
and society during the change and development. This garbage is crime.
And there is no way to development without this. Means when development take
place, changes occurs in norms of society and it changes crime increases and
changes its nature. If there is need of development, be ready to face it. Then
what is the way of development?? I think don’t halt your progress. But try to
manage this garbage and develop a mechanism to dispose it off and to recycle
these. One may ask what should be done for this. Simple answer what you do with
your garbage? You dispose them with the mechanism which suits to your garbage
with relatively new technologies. Means you change your system according to the
need. Here also you have to devolve new mechanism according to need. Don’t
through garbage in open but leave them at their place (punishment). If they are
hard to place at appropriate place just try to dispose them (capital) and if
they are reform able (recycle) then reform them. It means do not try to go
ahead with single concept rather apply all methods carefully.
Today there is urgent need to revise all the
theories of crime, jurisprudence and criminology. Because all of them are very
old and they were developed in different environment. They have less
applicability today. To understood this we will take example of MARX,
the giant name in sociology, developed his theories taking recourse
of capitalism and socialism. But, with what kind of capitalism? At that time he
was clear about investment, factories, production, income, labor, and surplus.
And considering these thing he propounded his theories. But at present
situation has been changed. Today
there is huge increase in income and in money without production. There is no
production but increase in capital is fast… for example with the help of technologies
(which were not visible at the time of Marx), there is increase in production
without the help of workers and capital gains a new high in only hand of owner
of that technologies. There is another example different from this. See
the case of Vadra. 7 cror spend on land and after very short time it became 58
cror without the help of labor or any production. Here which theory of Marx in
relation with capital will get applicability? If it is crime which theory of
crime will get applicability? I think there is need of new theories. Most of
theories were developed when technology was not as strong and means of
development were limited. But now there is Intellectual properties,
technologies which have defined the world and now we have the task to define
the law accordingly to face the garbage of these developments. Intellectuals are doing this job of
redefining the law and crime but they too are affected by the diesis of
corruption and self-serving. Some western intellectuals
have recognized the peacemaking as an important tool in criminal sphere
and they have pushed it in the world taking help of the international
traditional customs and thoughts of great saints like MAHATMA GANDHI and NELSON
MANDELA. We Indians are also being taught about the peacemaking and so called
universities and intellectuals are saying again and again that India was the
forerunner of the peace since the time of RAMA,
KRISHNA, BUDHA, and GANDHI. They tell us that western intellectuals are
claiming those things of which we have a long tradition. I want to ask one question, where, in all our holy religious texts,
there is reference about peacemaking. They never subscribe of peacemaking.
Because this was ineffective on crime and development. If there is any
reference it is with power. You must have power so that you may solve all
problems. We have MANUSMRITY, RAMAYANY, MAHABHARAT, etc for example.
Manunsmrity as code strictly subscribe punishment even capital punishment for
crime, RAMAYANA & MAABHARAT itself set an example to punish the wrongdoer
to the extent of elimination of their civilization. All these texts suggest a
way of peace but soon after they are setting example to destroy the evil. There
is one line in RAMAYANY “BIN BHAY HOT NA PREET” which shows if there is
no deterrence there will be no love, affection and good relation. If you have
power then there will be peace, love, and crimeless society. Imagine if there
were no nuclear weapons in the world. Was it possible to save the earth from
the next WORLD WAR. I am sure that without these weapons we were witness of
another world war.
SO
DON’T BE FRUSTRATED WITH ALL THE CROWDE AND “RETURN TO VEDAS” AND RELY ON YOUR
CULTURE AND HERITAGE, PUT THE DEVELOPMENT IN THAT FRAME AND WITNESS TO BE THE
GRESTEST, STRONG, CRIME FREE AND PEACEFULL SOCIETY. SANJAY SINGH
WITH THESE
WORDS WE FINISH OUR PROJECT
